6.9.11

RaceCard Rage QQ

New, interesting tidbit from The Chronicle of Higher Education (emphasis mine):

"White students make up 62 percent of full-time students enrolled in four-year colleges but receive 76 percent of institutional merit scholarships; and white students are 40 percent more likely to receive private scholarships than minority students are."

I look forward to the excuses explanations for why white folks are so much more deserving. Perhaps they will take inspiration from the recent NIH kerfluffle that makes my teeth grind to just to look at the various analyses, cries of indignation, and self-satisfied bigotry.

Figure 1: Have you somehow escaped this juggernaut of the science bloggynets? Go read that shit

For example, one brilliant comment at The Chronicle (with 39 likes) elucidates the inherent inferiority of black applicants, which is 100% (NOT) confirmed by the actual fucking study. Italics are the comment, quotations are data from Ginther+'s study

Black investigators may be the result of "special initiative" graduate and postgraduate training programs that provided poor preparation for a competitive research career, leading to poorer quality proposals.

"Model 4 included controls for previous NIH grants, NIH review experience, and NIH institute, and while it reduced the award differential for blacks and Asians by 1 percentage point, the differential was still significant (P < .001)." -Ginther et al Nature 2011

Black investigators are more likely to come from predominantly minority institutions, which rarely (if ever) offer infrastructure necessary to support cutting edge research, leading to poorer quality proposals.

"...when we added controls for education and NIH training in Model 2, the marginal effects did not change in size or significance. Model 3 added controls for employer characteristics, which reduced the significance of the marginal effects for Hispanics, but not for Asians or blacks (P < .001), compared with Model 1." -Ginther et al Nature 2011

Black investigators have available numerous "minority candidate status required" research support initiatives which are reviewed only against other minority candidates, and this experience denies them the opportunity to hone proposal development skills, leading to poorer quality proposals.

"For all applicants who received F or T training, blacks were 27.4 percentage points (P < .001), Asians were 6.9 percentage points (P < .01), and Hispanics were 9.5 percentage points (P < .01) less likely to ever receive an R01 award compared with whites" --Ginther et al Nature 2011

Another bit of brilliant flamebait:

Has anyone considered this perspective: Minorities have received preferential admissions treatment for admission to college, graduate school, for academic positions, and for tenure...

"Out of 69,300 science and engineering full professors in 2006, a mere 600--less than 1%--were African-American women." -ScienceMag

"Nationwide, blacks make up 5.3 percent of all full-time faculty at American colleges and universities. But a more accurate picture is obtained when we eliminate from the count the nation’s predominantly black colleges and universities. With that adjustment... nationwide, blacks are slightly more than 4 percent of the full-time faculty at predominantly white institutions of higher education." -JBHE

"None of the 28 other high-ranking universities (Ed: out of 30) have a percentage of black faculty that is equal to the national average of 5.3 percent. At Rice University, Stanford University, MIT, and CalTech, blacks make up less than 2 percent of the total faculty."-JBHE

FYI, we're almost 13% of the American population. Maybe the commenter meant the mythical fairy job they did not get last application cycle. But before my Caucasian readers dissolve in a puddle of white guilt, fear not! There are those wise ones that point out the "myopic view" of the study, for example:

"I think the data paint a fairly accurate picture of the current state of efforts to increase minority representation in the sciences – highlighting remaining challenges, but also noteworthy accomplishments that the paper and discussions about it have completely ignored." -Michael Eisen

Yea, we should have had a paragraph congratulating white people for accepting desegregation, allowing us to vote, and that super sweet moment when we got to be outside after 10pm. Whee.

Look, I'm sorry to break it to you, but every black person already in science knew this. They knew it, but couldn't get 100% incontrovertible evidence for it, so they never brought it up to you because you would scoff and say the anecdotal data of their getting slammed every review cycle while you sailed through was just their being a sore loser. When institutions devoted to minority issues start sniffing out the same problems, they are promptly ignored because everyone knows that minorities can't be objective about problems concerning them. That's for the big boys.

And then when some nice white people come do an in-depth study and publish it in a respectable place that other white people can go to without feeling uncomfortable, we must then listen to the neverending wail of excuses. But we are totally making progress! I, and none of my friends, would never have that kind of bias EVER, so it can't be possible! There must be some magical other variable that addresses this because scientists can't be racists! I totally made a rocker launcher for 4th grade science fair and the black kid won with a poster on diabetes so it's just SCIENCE KARMA!111!!!

Seeing cold, hard , numbers to confirm what we already knew is not going to scare the poor widdle minorities away, don't worry. We have actually been secretly indoctrinating our children that we have to be twice as good as the majority to hit the bottom rung, so it appears we were overzealous. The idea that this will frighten minorities away into some fictitious career where things are not exactly the same fucking way is at best, epically condescending. What makes me, personally, want to quit is when overeducated buttholes who are completely logical about everything else promptly shut down their brain and turns into the stereotypical Tea Bagger they like to make fun of whenever race comes up.

In summary,

1 comments:

EngineeringProf said...

Everyone should switch to double blind reviewing. I would love to see a side by side comparison, having a pool of researchers submit two proposals with one reviewed blind and see what happens. Sure there are those that make the argument that track record is important, but I'm starting to see that this argument is full of crap.